【許家星】“介于朱、王二本之間”——魏莊渠《年夜學指歸》對明代表學的批評、融一包養經驗通與重構

requestId:68499ac0636b67.89113876.

“Between the two books of Zhu and Wang”

——The criticism, integration and emphasis of Wei Zhuanqu’s “Big Guide” on the Ming representativesBaobao.com Comparison

Author: Xu Jiaxing

Source: “Hunan Major and Social Science Edition”

Time: Confucius was in the 2570th year of Jihai and Jisi

Jesus April 2, 2019

Written by Jesus on April 2, 2019

href=”http://www.twdaddy.net/”>Contracting contractIntroduction:Xu Jiaxing (1978-), male, newcomer from Fengfeng, Jiangxi, professor from the Beijing Teachers and Political Science Institute, professor at the value and civilization seminar, doctoral, purpose of the seminar: Four books and Song and Ming Philosophy.

Content summary:The Ming representative scholar Wei Zhuanqu’s development of “Study Guide” highlights the ultimate goodness, knowing the nature of stopping and understanding, and exploring things and understanding the root of things, which highlights the recklessness, steadily pursuing the roots of heaven, starting to be large, and doing one’s own kung fu. The test used this to solve the disadvantages of the separation and emptiness of the Zhu and Wang families, integrate the Zhu and Wang families, and open up the “third route” of Ming representative learning, highlight the reconciliation of the Ming representative learning evolution, and realize the diversity of the “Big Science” and create the ancients’ views that “either Zhu or Wang” to avoid making simple understanding of Ming representative learning.

Keywords: Wei Zhuanqu/《Big School Guide》/Ming Representatives to Learning/Middle Road, he laughed. Line/Wei Zhuangqu/The Great Learning Tenet/Neo-Confucianism of the Ming Dynasty/the middle way

Title notes: National social sciences major project: “History of China’s ‘Four Books’” (13&ZD060); Tendering courses for key bases of humanities and social sciences in Jiangxi Province: “Research on Jiangyou Four Books in the Ming Dynasty” (JD1407).

The two main lines of Zhu Zi and Yang Ming formed the Ming representative learning, but each had their own disadvantages. To this end, some scholars tried to integrate the thinking of the two schools of thoughts on critical acceptance, and formed the third main line of Ming representative learning, “between Zhu and Wang”, which can be called “middle route”. Some scholars have pointed out that the adjustment and refinement of Zhu Zi’s learning from Yang Ming Dynasty and the study of Ming Dynasty were the mainstream of the thinking world. ① This integration of Zhu and Wang’s thoughts was long before Wang’s.The nursing market has appeared at the beginning of the trend. Wei Xue (1483-1543, whose name is Zicai and whose name is Zhuqu) was a scholar of the same era as Yangming. He was also a representative of the “middle route” that criticized and integrated Zhu and Wang, and worked hard to rebuild Ming’s representative academic performance. The “Ming Confucian School Case” sets up the “Chongren School Case”, and convicted that Kang Qi “returns slightly but never dares to leave the right path”②. It also points out that the King of Jiangyou led the “silence” of the Shujiang River and said that it originated from the Shuqiu, which shows that the learning of the Shuqiu has close relationship with the Zhu and Wang families. The minister of the Four Library also said that Zhuangqu’s main work, “The Big Learning Guide”, is “between the two books Zhu and Wang, and is even more skillful in the accompanying meeting.” ③This article uses “Study Instructions” as the middle, and combines works such as “Zhuqu Books” to remind Zhuanqu’s “Study” of “Study” to arouse the academic community’s further thinking about the representative academic development franchise.

A “The branch and the emptiness and silence are biased”④

The Zhuangqu has the situation of “the big road is hidden and the academic breaks down”. Through the book “Study Guide”, the test corrected the disadvantages of Zhu Xi’s “branch” and “empty conversation” in learning Zhu Xi, and pointed out the path of sacred learning to “suffer” to learn to “suffer” and to point out the path of sacred learning to “suffer” to learn to learn to “suffer his first”. He criticized Zhu Zi for having a bias of having a clear and less sloppy approach than straits, which led to the disadvantages of postgraduate education. “All the students in the world know that Zhu Zi is the way to learn from Zhu Zi. Although he has too much knowledge and too little knowledge, the reason why later Confucians left behind.” ⑤ also pointed out that Yang Mingxue seems to be easy to be simple and has no branches left behind. In fact, he talks about his actions and violates the teachings of sages who speak quickly and act quickly, and becomes a big disease of “clear discussion” among the people. “The people who teach today’s sages seem to be easy to say, and they are different from the secular subordinates and subordinates. If they examine their actions, they will not be able to see them.” ⑥ “I say that they are excited! But they often like empty words. What is the difference between talking about the Qing Dynasty?” ⑦

The two families of Zhu and Wang “the branch and subordinates are biased, and the Hunting and Lie are both biased” by Zhuqu and Wang. Zhuqu directly follows the Confucian classics, and try to correct the mistakes of the two schools by creatively essaying “Big Xue” to rebuild the right path of Taoism. Wang Ting’s preface to “The Big Learning Instructions” points out that the difference between “The Big Learning Chapters” and “The Big Learning Instructions” is that the former is just an interpretation text, while the latter directly points to the direction of learning. “The chapters and sentences analyze their meanings, and the “Guide” is the trend of the word “Guide””. This “one trend” emphasizes that the learning of the predecessors represented by “Big Learning” is the learning of the mind. “The learning of the predecessors is the learning of the mind. It is not the learning of the outside mind.” ⑧Zhuangqu believed that this statement briefly highlighted the purpose of “Studying” in “Big Learning” and was a virtue.

Zhangqu highly claims to be the wonderful place of “Big School” 彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩�The most simple and simple way of studying is the most easy and simple. It is said that the self-generated and difficult, and the Yangming is provoked.” ⑨ It uses a very simple method to understand the “destiny” of sages from ancient times to the present, so there is no slight slight misunderstanding of the comments and bodies of the book. Yangming’s “Big Learning” inspired Zhu Zi’s learning of the complicated chapters and sentences. He repeatedly pointed out that “Big Learning” emphasizes the development of kung fu from the source of kung fu, and the development and evil spirits of the holy kung fu are clearly instigated, with the beginning and end of the beginning and end. Therefore, Zhu Qu wrote three books on “Big School”: the ancient version of “Big School” written in ancient Chinese; the ancient version uses “Big School” to fully understand the “Big School” thinking; and the “Big School Examination” is a collection of “Big School” based on the text differences of “Big School”. “Big School Examination” is the place where Zhu Qu’s life was sweating, and it was revised several times, and sent it to Wang Ting for the preface the year before his past life. “Big School” is also It is a work that was completed by Zhuqu’s “Zhengliu” plan.

Zhouqu’s determination highlighted the meaning of “rejuvenation” in “Big Science” and proposed the term “rejuvenation” in “Big Science”. It believes that “rejuvenation” is a “rejuvenation”. “It means the learning of a big man.” The so-called “big man” is not the “growth” that Confucius said, “can be said to be adults,” and includes scholars, scholars, and saints. Zhuangqu likes to use the expression “beginning as a scholar, and in the beginning, as a scholar, and ultimately as a saint”. He believes that the way to become a saint in “big scholar” is originally “as open as a street”, but he is misled by the merits of the academic discipline, which leads to the learning of the saints that focus on self-cultivationIntegrates the body into the study of the wall study books, which leads to “taking reading as learning” and “the way is on paper”.